Key Points From the Sam Bankman-Fried Trial’s First Week

[adinserter block=”2″]

Key Points From the Sam Bankman-Fried Trial's First Week

[ad_1]

Gary Wang – who’s previously pleaded guilty to similar charges to what Bankman-Fried faces – testified that Bankman-Fried directed him to write code allowing Alameda Research to have a negative balance on FTX as far back as July 2019.

Ultimately Alameda took and spent at least $8 billion of FTX customers’ money, Wang said.

Wang opened by saying he committed crimes, did so with Bankman-Fried, Caroline Ellison and Nishad Singh and that he was hoping for no jail time as a result of his cooperation.

FTX had an insurance fund with an amount listed on its website, but this amount was essentially a randomly generated figure, Wang said.

For a while, FTX executives didn’t actually know how much Alameda owed its customers because of a software bug, Adam Yedidia said. The bug overstated the amount owed by $8 billion (essentially twice the real amount).

Alameda used FTX customer deposits to pay back its lenders, Yedidia said. Wang later confirmed that Alameda had returned lenders’ funds and that these funds “came from FTX customers.”

FTX presented itself as a safe custodian to investors like Paradigm, Matt Huang said.

Similarly, Bankman-Fried told Paradigm that Alameda had no preferential treatment, Huang said. Wang later said Alameda did receive special treatment (see point 1).

At no point did Bankman-Fried or anyone at FTX tell Paradigm that Alameda was exempt from its auto-liquidation feature, Huang said.

Paradigm has marked its $278 million investment in FTX to zero, Huang said.

[ad_2]

Source link

[adinserter block=”2″]

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*